SIGN UP or LOG IN here to add your Destination, Vacancy or Business to our international Business Tourism directory. Rss-text Rss-video
My_mr_pages
Gallowglass Abu Dhabi Etihad Airways Singapore Expo ADNEC Jumeirah Fred : StreamPoints Birmingham Convention Bureau RBS Williams F1 Conference Centre Visit Britain Singapore Tourist Board : Global Gallowglass Abu Dhabi Etihad Airways Singapore Expo ADNEC Jumeirah Fred : StreamPoints Birmingham Convention Bureau RBS Williams F1 Conference Centre Visit Britain Singapore Tourist Board : Global
Logo A great night at the Eventia UK Awards Why logistics alone are no longer enough
  • New dedicated office shows Hong Kong’s commitment to meetings and events
  • The global events city
  • Health & Safety and the CMCHA in association with Gallowglass
  • Why the Asian city’s events industry is buzzing
  • City of Culture
  • Is Australia worth the business trip?
  • Etihad keeps its word
  • Why meetings and conferences lie at Dolce's heart
  • Why Canada is closer than you think
  • The growth of India’s conference and events industry
  • Business Briefing
Business news
Is government policy damaging £22 billion business tourism market?
star full star full star half star blank star blank - Log in to give your rating
0 Comment(s) 02/04/2007
by Ian Whiteling   Printable version

A top-level breakfast presentation and discussion on business tourism, hosted recently by events association Eventia, united the meetings and events industry’s most influential organisations during the first ever British Tourism Week.

The theme from speakers was consistent: government policy is holding them back.

Held at the Riverbank Park Plaza, the breakfast event highlighted the importance of meetings and events to the UK tourism industry, with a primary focus on how it sustains and supports Britain’s business community.

One of the speakers, Business Tourism Partnership (BTP) chairman Michael Hirst OBE, cited the sector to be worth £22 billion to the UK economy – around 26% of total tourism revenues – and has grown by 53% in the past decade, much faster growth than tourism overall. In fact, said the Tourism Alliance’s Kurt Janson, without the meetings and event business, tourism into the UK would have declined in that period.

“We are asking for greater support from government” concluded Hirst. “If it can happen for sports events such as the Olympics, why can’t it happen for business events? We should see ministers attending overseas trade presentations to attract business events as they do in other countries.”

A sad indictment of the Government's seeming ambivalence to business tourism and the events industry, was the fact that an MP due to attend the breakfast never appeared. This did not dampen the enthusiam of those present for a debate, however.

This kind of attitude from government does beg the question whether lobbying is worth it, and couldn't the time, money and effort that associations like Eventia and the AEO are putting into it be better spent on marketing campaigns promoting the industry to marketers and key corporate decision makers. After all, not only is the events industry generating money for the exchequer, but it's also helping companies market themselves better, and therefore making them more successful.

Look out for interviews on EVENTS:review later this month with Michael Hirst and Eventia chairman Nigel Cooper tackling some of the issues mentioned in this article, and recorded at the Business Tourism Breakfast.

Email this to a colleague:
Please log in give your rating here.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of content appearing on MEETINGS:review, the company accepts no responsibility or liability for comment or expression by third parties appearing on this web site.
GIBTM 2008 Report
Official MEETINGS:review Charity: Just A Drop
About Us | Advertising on MEETINGS:review | Contact Us | © MEETINGS:review | Produced by The Frederation
Whilst every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of content appearing on MEETINGS:review, the company
accepts no responsibility or liability for comment or expression by third parties appearing on this web site.